CUSTOMER EXPERIENCENanny service

Raman Upmanyu reports delayed nanny replacement and a refund dispute

Upmanyu says a nanny left due to illness and that he had waited 20 days for a replacement by 7 March 2026, while his refund request remained disputed.

THE FULL STORY

Raman Upmanyu says he paid ₹7,814 on 27 January 2026 for a six-month nanny service after describing his requirements. According to his LinkedIn post, no nanny was assigned for eight days. A nanny was then assigned but left on 16 February because of illness. Upmanyu says he was still waiting for a replacement 20 days later, on 7 March, despite follow-ups.

He says the company later told him it could not meet his criteria. He reports first being told a refund would be processed, then being told he was not eligible, and asks for a full refund.

EXPLORE FURTHER

Topics in this story.

Browse all stories ↗